Pjam Law

Client Care and Funding

Lawyers are required to discuss all means of funding with their clients. This information must be included in the client care letter or engagement letter. An electronic template denoting the letterhead of your consultancy practice is the best means of keeping the client informed about their case status.

The client is legally obliged to pay the lawyer if they “win” (which means achieving the quickest possible pre-action payout). Otherwise, there are no legal rights to recover the costs of the action from the other side before proceedings are issued. In case the claim is turned down or discontinued, the client will need to be indemnified.

General PI Litigation Procedures

Basic Legal Principles

(Not to be confused with the realities of life)

  • Duty of Care
  • Foreseeable Risk or Breach of Duty
  • The Nature of the Duty:
    • Reasonable Practicability
    • Strict Liability
  • Causation (not to be confused with the cause of the accident)
  • Quantum
  • Limitation

The Realities of Life

  • How did it happen?
  • Can we prove it?
  • Contributory Negligence (applies equally to liability, causation, and quantum)

Beyond the Norm

Special Considerations

  • Minors: Limitation, Litigation Friend, Court Approval
  • Deceased Cases: Limitation, Law Reform vs. Fatal Accidents, Dependency
  • Outside UK/Ireland: Office-based cases, Directives, Treaties, Funding, Applicable Law

Other Options

  • Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA)
  • Pneumoconiosis (Workers Compensation) Scheme
  • Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB)
  • Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit (IIDB)
  • Disability Discrimination Act (DDA)

Duty of Care

Where It Might Not Exist

  • Occupiers, Employers, Reputable Contractors (but note the non-delegable duty of care for employers)
  • Date of Knowledge / “State” of Knowledge (e.g., industrial injuries with latency)
  • Vicarious Liability (Was the person acting in the course of their employment?)
  • Psychiatric Injury (Primary or Secondary Victim?)

Foreseeable Risk or Breach of Duty

  • Common Law: Subject to foreseeability and reasonable practicability
  • Statute: Legal requirements depend on legislative wording; select the right piece of legislation
  • If in doubt: Plead all relevant legislation (see Letter of Claim)

Causation

  • Relevant in both accident and disease claims
  • “Straightforward” accidents may become complicated due to medical evidence (e.g., spinal injuries)
  • Psychological effects (e.g., functional overlay, PTSD)
  • Always check medical records and accident book for consistency

Industrial Diseases

  • Knowledge of each condition is essential to identify typical markers
  • Determine if the condition is work-related, considering:
    • Relationship to the work environment (e.g., occupational asthma, WRULD, RSI)
    • Latency periods (e.g., HAVS, CTS)
    • Other possible causes (e.g., RSI, WRULD, CTS)
  • Consult appropriate medical experts
  • Consider apportionment:
    • Negligent vs. Non-negligent exposure
    • Other contributing factors (e.g., psychological injury, smoking)
    • Non-recoverable exposure (e.g., asbestos)

Quantum

General Damages (Pain, Suffering & Loss of Amenity)

  • Ensure medical evidence is detailed for appropriate valuation
  • Use guidelines and case law

Special Damages

Covers all losses and expenses, provided they are not too remote. Examples:

  • Loss of earnings (including primary and secondary work)
  • Loss of partner’s earnings
  • Travel expenses
  • Medication costs
  • Pension loss
  • Services (e.g., household assistance)
  • Membership fees (e.g., gym, golf)
  • Additional heating and electricity costs
  • Loss of enjoyment (e.g., horse ownership)
  • Small but relevant costs (e.g., batteries for a TENS machine)

Examples of Remoteness

  • Mortgage arrears/overdraft interest due to absence from work

Future Loss

Consider:

  • Remoteness and speculative claims (e.g., loss of promotion)
  • Ogden Tables: Mathematical approach or lump sum
  • Pension calculations (Auty approach)
  • Double recovery prevention
  • Full and Final Settlement vs. Provisional Damages
  • Risk of serious deterioration or further significant conditions
  • Award discretion by the judge

Mitigation of Loss

The claimant has a duty to:

  • Seek appropriate medical treatment
  • Obtain alternative employment or redeployment
  • Consider Compensation Recovery Unit (CRU) deductions
  • Understand benefit deductions and appeal options

Limitation

General Rules

  • Accidents: Court proceedings must be issued within 3 years from the accident date.
  • Disease Claims: 3 years from the date the claimant knew (or ought to have known) that they had a significant condition due to a third party’s actions.

Key Considerations

  • What constitutes “significant”?
  • When should they have known? (Subjective vs. objective test)
  • Exceptions:
    • Air travel accidents: Warsaw Convention (2-year limitation, strict liability)
    • CICA claims: 2 years from assault date
    • Clinical negligence: 3-year limitation
    • Professional negligence (PI cases): 6-year limitation

Points to Remember

  • Always provide limitation advice
  • Err on the side of caution
  • Issue and serve proceedings correctly

Service of Proceedings

Direct Access Barrister

  • Must be served within 4 months of issue
  • Check service address and registered office even after issue
  • Special considerations:
    • Companies in liquidation/administration
    • Service on nominated solicitors
    • Substituted service
    • Limitation waiver and extensions
  • Service without medical evidence or special damages
  • Limitation as a defense consideration

Realities of Life in Litigation

Pursuing the Claim

  • The burden of proof is on the claimant
  • Key evidence sources:
    • Accident book entries (must be consistent and signed)
    • Medical records
    • Witness statements
    • DWP and HSE documentation
    • Police accident reports
    • Inquest depositions
    • Relevant publications and meeting minutes
    • Union safety representatives (rights under health and safety laws)

Evidential Matters

Liability

  • Slip/trip claims require evidence of cause
  • System of work (written instructions vs. notices)
  • Res Ipsa Loquitur: Some accidents may imply negligence without direct proof
  • Addressing denial through realistic settlement offers

Causation

  • Aggravation of pre-existing conditions
  • Delays in seeking medical treatment
  • Large gaps in medical records

Quantum

  • Loss of earnings (comparative analysis)
  • Promotion prospects (union records, colleagues, past practices, appraisals)
  • Services previously provided by the claimant
  • Loss of enjoyment of hobbies

Contributory Negligence

  • Burden of proof is on the defendant
  • Considerations:
    • Common workplace practices
    • Condoned systems of work

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *